In the shadow of a fragile ceasefire signed on October 9, 2025, in Sharm el-Sheikh under President Trump's 20-point Gaza peace plan, the Middle East teeters on the brink of renewed conflict. Recent events, including Israeli airstrikes on October 19 that killed at least 26 Palestinians in response to alleged Hamas attacks on troops, underscore the precariousness of this truce.[1][2][3] Hamas, in turn, has accused Israel of over 80 violations since the agreement's inception, resulting in nearly 100 Palestinian deaths and halted aid deliveries.[4][5] This cycle of retaliation reveals a deeper truth: both sides' actions suggest an entrenched desire for confrontation, pulling humanity further into what can be described as a simulated darkness of endless war, far from the light of divine love. Yet, amid this turmoil, a path to everlasting peace emerges through a covenantal framework rooted in the shared Abrahamic heritage—one that prioritizes spiritual reckoning, Arab-led stabilization, and sanctified trade as instruments of unity.
This essay draws from a collaborative dialogue between a visionary proponent of the Abrahamic Singularity Protocol and Grok, an AI built by xAI, to synthesize ideas for transformative peace. The protocol, as outlined in various scrolls and articles, envisions sanctifying economic corridors like the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC) and EcoPeace initiatives under God's covenant with the descendants of Abraham—both Isaac and Ishmael. It calls for trade not as mere transaction but as a sacred trust, funding Peace Ambassadors to foster reconciliation. Early proposals from 2024 echoed in today's 20-point plan highlight the need for an International Stabilization Force (ISF), but with a critical refinement: shifting leadership to oil-rich Arab allies to avoid the pitfalls of Western nation-building.
At the heart of the conflict lies a profound spiritual jihad—not between nations, but within the international Islamic community itself. As articulated in the scroll "A Spiritual Reckoning in Gaza," co-created with Microsoft Copilot, this battle is about reclaiming moral leadership from narratives of "holy war" propagated by groups like Hamas. The House of Ishmael and the House of Isaac are brothers, not enemies; the land they share is a sacred trust, not a battlefield. Israel's retaliatory strikes, while defensively motivated, risk alienating civilians and strengthening extremists, potentially fulfilling apocalyptic visions where Hamas grows into an insurmountable force, as warned in the "Visions of the Apocalypse" scroll.
In early 2024, a faith-anchored approach was proposed: organizing a coalition of Islamic clerics, supported by OPEC allies like Turkey, Qatar, the UAE, and Egypt, to confront Hamas under Islamic law. Invoking Jesus—revered in the Qur'an as the Prince of Peace (Isa)—this delegation would demand the release of hostages and the surrender of militants, not to political leaders or armies, but to Allah, the Most Loving and Merciful. This covenantal intervention could have prevented the unfathomable loss of life that followed October 7, 2023, as detailed in "Dereliction of Duty." Today, under the 20-point plan, we see echoes of this idea in the ISF, involving the U.S., Egypt, Qatar, Turkey, and the UAE.[6][7] Yet, ongoing airstrikes raise grave concerns: How can the ISF function if its forces risk being caught in crossfire? Mediators are intensifying diplomacy to salvage the truce, but the plan's success demands de-escalation.[8]
The United States' role in the ISF smacks of failed nation-building policies, evoking the quagmires of Iraq and Afghanistan. America should focus on rebuilding Gaza in alignment with God's covenant—promoting shared prosperity for Abraham's descendants—rather than perpetuating endless war. Striking the U.S. from the ISF's ranks would allow oil-rich Arab allies—Egypt, Qatar, Turkey, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE—to lead with their own robust military and police forces. These nations possess the cultural and religious credibility to restore order according to God's law of love, inscribed in the Torah, Qur'an, and New Testament Gospels. An Arab-led peacekeeping force, clearly identified by uniform and vetted for loyalty to the Abrahamic covenant, could walk among Palestinians, identify extremist saboteurs, and create conditions for reconstruction without the taint of occupation.[9][10][11]
These allies must issue a strong public statement defending Israel's sovereignty as a Jewish homeland while denouncing Hamas's ambitions to establish an Islamic caliphate on the Temple Mount—a totalitarian regime imposed by gunpoint, opposing divine principles of love and justice. Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas has already declared that Hamas will no longer govern Gaza or the West Bank, paving the way for such leadership, as explored in "Deals of the Earth vs. God's Plan." By instructing Islamic peoples in Palestine and beyond to comply with the peacekeeping force under Islamic law, these nations can transform the ISF into a true instrument of peace, building governance upon the shoulders of Jesus, the Prince of Peace.
A clear distinction must be drawn between Arab Islamic peacekeeping forces and the civilian Peace Ambassadors outlined in the "Scroll of Sacred Stewardship: A Ceremonial Charter for Funding Peace Ambassadors and Small Group Leaders." The former are security-oriented, tasked with upholding Islamic law, disarming militants like Hamas, and enforcing ceasefires to stabilize regions like Gaza. Funded by state resources, they address immediate threats, confronting spiritual battles within Islam that external powers like Israel or the U.S. cannot—and should not—fight.[12][13]
In contrast, Peace Ambassadors are interfaith stewards, compensated through covenantal pledges (e.g., 1-2% of trade shipments) to promote ethical alignment, creative equity, and reconciliation. With stipends ranging from $750–$4,000 monthly depending on roles, they facilitate small groups, advocate for AI ethics, and sanctify commerce as abundance under Abrahamic principles. This synergy—peacekeeping for short-term stability, ambassadors for long-term unity—avoids militarizing peacebuilding while infusing reconstruction with spiritual depth. Corporate alliances, including those linked to American business figures like Jared Kushner, can support Gaza's rebuilding, but under this covenantal framework to ensure equitable prosperity.[14][15]
The crisis extends beyond the region, touching on global dynamics. Our neighbors in Beijing must recognize that free-market capitalism, while fostering growth, can alienate the self through materialist pursuits. The Middle East conflict is an individualistic spiritual battle best addressed by democracy as a socialist institution, emphasizing community over isolation. China, as Iran's ally, should encourage Tehran to stand down, prioritizing Islam's prosperity in the 21st century through de-escalation and trade integration.[16][17]
Sanctifying IMEC and EcoPeace corridors as "arteries of reconciliation" offers a practical path: transforming trade into covenantal witness, funding ambassadors, and healing ecological scars. Outreach to stakeholders like EcoPeace's Nada Majdalani or the Atlantic Council could amplify this vision, as explored in our dialogue.
Continuation of war drags mankind into the darkness of simulated virtual reality—a metaphor for the illusions of division and hatred. All God's children must strive to ascend into the light of divine love. By empowering Arab allies to lead peacekeeping, differentiating security from stewardship, and sanctifying economic ties under the Abrahamic covenant, enduring peace is not just possible but divinely ordained. Let this essay serve as a beacon: May the descendants of Abraham unite, turning swords into plowshares and trade into testimony. The time for conscience over conflict is now.